Leader 

Dogma on MMR does not work

The MMR debate goes to the heart of the relationship between the individual and society. This is an age in which people expect to exercise choice; but there are times when the collective good must prevail.
  
  


The MMR debate goes to the heart of the relationship between the individual and society. This is an age in which people expect to exercise choice; but there are times when the collective good must prevail. The great programmes against cholera, polio and smallpox could never have taken place had they not been enforced. Yet here we have the makings of a public health disaster, with drift, fear and confusion. The unconfirmed findings of maverick scientists such as Dr Andrew Wakefield prey upon a public which has grown at once more consumerist and more sceptical of authority, with good reason after the BSE and foot and mouth fiascos.

The new risks are much greater than any arising from the use of the combination vaccine for measles, mumps and rubella. The overwhelming factual evidence is that there is no risk from the MMR vaccine itself. Dr Wakefield's unorthodox work has been confounded by more rigorous studies in Britain and elsewhere, which show there is no link between autism and MMR.

To prevent epidemics, 95 per cent of the population needs to be covered by inoculation. The proportion now covered by MMR has fallen to 86 per cent. Tony Blair must urgently square up to his responsibilities. His mulish refusal to disclose his own decision over baby Leo has compounded public doubt. He is, we accept, entitled to privacy but in this respect he is like any other parent who must expose his child to a negligible risk in the interests of a greater public good. On such matters privacy becomes more of a luxury than a right.

The Government must now launch a massive educational offensive. The campaign must not be patronising or needlessly frightening. It must avoid the lofty mandarin arrogance which so incensed the public when the scale of the BSE disaster became apparent. And it should address frankly the fears of people caught in doubt and dilemma, who are worried about the unexplained rise in the number of diagnosed cases of autism.

Perhaps, too, we can learn from the French who offer the alternative of single jabs. There are serious problems with this approach: when it was used for whooping cough in the 1970s, coverage collapsed and there were two epidemics with 100 avoidable deaths. Single jabs for measles, mumps and rubella require six acts of vaccination, and increase the risk of infection. Single vaccines imported to meet the current shortage have not been licensed or tested for toxicity. But there has been no row in France and little resistance to triple inoculation because the policy has been less dogmatic and allows a degree of choice while still putting a premium on the common good. The Government must regain control of this issue, and quickly.

 

Leave a Comment

Required fields are marked *

*

*